All Studies Meta Analysis Recent:

Professor tied to altered Andrew Hill paper also prepared 'Ivermectin Evidence' for World Health Organisation

Harper, P.

Mar 2022

Post
Facebook

Source PDF All Studies Meta AnalysisMeta

Ivermectin for COVID-19

4th treatment shown to reduce risk in August 2020

^*, now known with p < 0.00000000001 from 102 studies, recognized in 22 countries.

Lower risk for mortality, ventilation, ICU admission, hospitalization, recovery, cases, and viral clearance.

No treatment is 100% effective. Protocols combine complementary and synergistic treatments. ^* >10% efficacy in meta analysis with ≥3 clinical studies.

4,000+ studies for 60+ treatments. c19ivm.org

Forensic analysis of the Hill meta analysis discovering an unlisted author potentially connected to changes and also related to the WHO ivermectin analysis.

Author notes that "the person who allegedly edited the Andrew Hill paper on Ivermectin, is the person in receipt of consultancy fees from pharma with competing products, is the person who prepared the evidence base for the World Health Organisation to make their recommendation on Ιvermectin."

Author also notes: "I absolutely do not support anyone, in any way, who wishes to contact any of the people named in my articles. As I have stated before, what I [am] showing here are people caught inside a system with a great many competing interests. It’s not easy to be well adjusted to a medical research industry that is entirely broken."

1. philharper.substack.com, philharper.substack.com/p/ivermectin-part-3-the-people-behind?utm_source=url&s=r.philharper.substack.com/p/ivermectin-part-3-the-people-behind?utm_source=url&s=r.

2. philharper.substack.com (B), philharper.substack.com/p/the-competing-interests-of-those?utm_source=url&s=r.philharper.substack.com/p/the-competing-interests-of-those?utm_source=url&s=r.

Important missing comments or errors? Let us know.

Harper et al., 7 Mar 2022, preprint, 1 author.

This Paper Ivermectin All

Download Image

Please send us corrections, updates, or comments. c19early involves the extraction of 100,000+ datapoints from thousands of papers. Community updates help ensure high accuracy. Treatments and other interventions are complementary. All practical, effective, and safe means should be used based on risk/benefit analysis. No treatment or intervention is 100% available and effective for all current and future variants. We do not provide medical advice. Before taking any medication, consult a qualified physician who can provide personalized advice and details of risks and benefits based on your medical history and situation. FLCCC and WCH provide treatment protocols.

Submit

Post

@CovidAnalysis

FAQ

Public domain CC0 1.0